Project  MOSAIC

Project number : 45527

MOSAIC Consortium

Market Plan

Issue : 1/0

WP 1200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

1 Introduction

1.1 Scope
1.2 Definition, Acronyms and Abbreviations
1.3 Reference Documents:
1.4 Applicable Documents
1.5 Document Structure

2 The Promoters of Mosaic

2.1 Provide all relevant information to identify the promoters and qualify its ability to execute the project. This include its Legal status, Corporate Structure, Capital Structure, Organisation, Staff levels and Past experience in similar projects

3 Mosaic Scope and Objectives

3.1 Provide a summary description of the Project. Describe its objectives

4 The Services and the Marketing Approach

4.1 Describe the services that will be provided
4.2 Describe the Users of the Services. The users are the Organisations or the individuals that will be using and paying for the services
4.3 Describe the Demand for the Services to be Provided and expected competition
4.4 Describe How the services will be marketed, including the pricing approach and expected market Share 4.4.1 Phase 1 – Activities

5 Mosaic Implementation

5.1 Provide a technical and functional description of the system (Include also here a review of the standards used through the project to ensure inter-operability and inter-connectivity)
5.2 Describe the physical investment that need to be made, such as servers, workstations, PCs and other equipment
5.3 Describe the non-Physical investment that need to be made such as studies, pilots, software development, training, technical assistance, etc
    France

5.4 Describe the resources necessary to operate the services and to identify performance indicators
5.5 Provide a provisional time table of the project up to deployment and operation. Identify specific milestones where the project will be formally reviewed by the promoters and the decision to deploy be made

6 Financial Analysis

6.1 Cost 6.1.1 Provide an analysis of all investments costs of the project. Refer to 5.2 and 5.3 above. Identify those costs already included
6.1.2 Provide a summary analysis of the costs of operating the services, including communications costs. Refer to 5.4 above
6.2 Revenue
6.3 Financial Projections 6.3.1 Provide summary financial statements i.e. profit and loss statement by year, balance sheet, cash flow analysis for the investment period up to the third year of operations
6.3.2 Provide a calculation of the break even point and the financial rate of return

6.3.3 Show how the Community contribution and other public aid will affect the profitability of the project
6.4 Financing Plan Envisaged 6.4.1 Describe how the project, including the deployment and first three years of operations, is financed, i.e combination of private and public funds, equity financing, loans, grants, cash from operations, prototer’s own funds or other financial instruments

7 Risk and Dependencies

7.1 MOSAIC Legal Framework 7.1.1 Mosaic International Organisation plan 7.2 The IPR Problem 7.2.1 The EC laws on IPR 7.2.1.1 European Union legislation
7.2.1.2 Differences between the European Community members and the EFTA members
7.2.1.3 The position of the Nordic countries regarding the IPR problem: The Extended Collective License
7.2.2 IPR laws in others non - European countries 7.2.2.1 U.S.A & Canada
7.2.2.2 Japan
7.2.3 WIPO
7.2.4 WTO

7.2.5 Agreement between the World Intellectual Property Organization and the World Trade Organization

7.2.6 Fear Dealing and Fair Use

7.2.7 Potential Pitfalls in Multimedia Media product development: clearing the necessary content right
7.2.7.1 Fundamental issues of content licensing 7.2.7.1.1 Subject Matter of License
7.2.7.1.2 Scope of Rights Granted
7.2.7.1.3 Term and Termination
7.2.7.1.4 Fees and Royalties
7.2.7.1.5 Credits
7.2.7.1.6 Representations, Warranties and Indentification:
7.2.7.2 Licensing content for multimedia applications. 7.2.7.2.1 Licensing Music
7.2.7.2.2 Licensing Text
7.2.7.2.3 Licensing Photographs, Artwork and Other Still Images
7.2.7.2.4 Licensing Motion Pictures and Other Audiovisual Works
7.2.7.3 Obtaining content for multimedia without licensing 7.2.7.3.1 Developing your Own Content
7.2.7.3.2 Using Pre-existing Content without licensing
7.2.8 Watermarking Technology for Copyright Protection : General Requirements and Interoperability. 7.2.8.1 The different kinds of watermarking
7.2.8.2 How is a watermarking done in practice
7.2.9 The Encryption Technology overview 7.2.9.1 Some examples of famous algorithms for Encryption:
7.2.9.2 Tools for Image Encryption:
7.3 The needs of maintaining an high scientific level
7.4 The difficulties of having secure transactions on the web

8 Economic Analysis

8.1 The social Benefits 8.1.1 Mosaic contributes to the competitiveness of the European multimedia market
8.1.2 Mosaic gets near different Institutions such as Universities, Schools, Libraries and Museums

8.1.3 Trough Mosaic the fruition problem for disabled and elderly finds a solution

8.1.4 The economic benefits on employment in a CSC
8.1.4.1 Creation of a managerial team
8.1.4.2 Creation of a new professional profile: the Techno-Art
8.1.4.3 Employment for low qualificated profiles
8.1.4.4 CSC creation helps to have induced economic activities
9 Annexes 9.1 Annex - Outline of legal FrameWork and Problems in Europe
9.2 Annex - Country Analysis
9.3 Annex - Comparative Analysis of EC & EFTA National Practices
9.4 Annex - Legislation in England
9.5 Annex - Legislation in France
9.6 Annex - International Initiatives & EC project
9.7 Annex - International sites
9.8 Annex - Ronchey Law
9.9 Annex - Legislation in some European Countries 9.9.1 Legislation in Italy
9.9.2 Legislation in England

9.9.3 Legislation in France
9.10 Annex – The MOSAIC agreements
9.11 Annex - Company Profiles 9.11.1 Profile of Banca di Roma
9.11.2 Profile of AIT - Applied Information Technique Ltd.

9.11.3 Profile of Arenotech

9.11.4 Profile of Politecnico di Milano – Diset

9.11.5 Profile of ART+COM

9.11.6 Profile of CCG - Centro de Computação Gráfica

9.11.7 Profile of CINECA

9.11.8 Profile of Università di Trieste – DEEI

9.11.9 Profile of Fondation Sophia Antipolis

9.11.10 Profile of Hewlett Packard

9.11.11 Profile of Imation

9.11.12 Profile of Infobyte

9.11.13 Profile of Joanneum Research

9.11.14 Profile of Schloß Schönbrunn Kultur- und Betriebsges. m.b.H.

9.11.15 Profile of Silicon Graphics

9.11.16 Profile of ZGDV

9.11.17 Profile of Universidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro

9.11.18 Profile of Universidade do Minho

9.11.19 Profile of Museo D. Diogo de Sousa/IPM Instituto Portogues de Museus

9.11.20 Profile of Centro De Estudios Del Patrimonio S.A.

9.11.21 Profile of Università di Bologna Dipartimento Discipline storiche

9.11.22 Profile of Cryo on Line

9.11.23 Profile of Institute of Conservation, Goteborg University
9.12 Annex – Planning



1. Introduction

    1.1 Scope

    The document target is to integrate the result of the project into an overall plan and demonstrate the commercial and financial viability (internal rate of return).

    In the document is identified the impact of telecommunications costs (as well as other critical business factors such as property rights, regulatory issues, availability of basic networks or generic services) and it is described how the overall project is planned to be financed.

    Using statistical inputs about cultural wealth fruition the business forecast is built. The main info source input is the experience of Partners involved in the Mosaic project.

    1.2 Definition, Acronyms and Abbreviations

    EEA:  European Economic Area
    EFTA:  European Free Trade Association
    IPR:  Intellectual Property Right
    NII:  National Infrastructure Information
    READI:  Rights for Electronic Access and Delivery of Information
    TRIPS :  Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
    VLmp:  Virtual Library museum page
    WIPO:  Intellectual Property Right
    WTO :  World Trade Association

     

    1.3 Reference Documents:

    Intellectual property law Primer for multimedia developers Copyright 1994 by J.Dianne Brinson and Mark F.Radcliffe (based on: Multimedia Law Handbook from Ladera P)

    URLs Topics
    http://www.echo.lu
    http://www2.echo.lu/libraries/en/ecup.html
    http://www.echo.lu/libraries/en/libraries.html

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION WEB SITE -LAWS ON IPR

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/ http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/
    http://www.cyberlaw.com/
    http://www.Kopinor.no/english/ext-eng.htm
    http://www.wipo.int/eng/diplcon/distrib/100dc.htm
    http://www.strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc_mrksv/cipo/prod_ser/online/guides_e/g_cop_e1.htm
    http://www.wto.org/intellec/3-ipgpbp.htm

    LAWS ON IPR

    http://www.infowin.org/acts/rus/projects/ac019.htm
    http://www.laas.research.ec.org/esp-syn/text/20460.htm
    http://www.albion.ncl.ac.uk/esp-syn/text/21671.htm
    http://www.imprimatur.alcs.co.uk

    OTHER EUROPEAN PROJECTS

    http://www.trace.wisc.edu/docs
    http://www.cs.reading.ac.uk/museum/mw97/paper/node

    STATISTICS ON ELDERY AND DISABLED

    http://www.cybercash.com/cybercsah/services
    http://www.cybercash.com/cybercash/company/news/releases/1998/98may06barclay.htm
    http://www.activmedia.com/restricted/webrevenues2.html
    http://www.iijnet.or.jp/fmmc/501e.htm
    http://www.nomade.fr/contenu/infoendirect/afp

    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE

    http://www.konbib.nl/infolev/rkd/engpubl/mmwg/12-right.htm
    http://www.hllaw.com/articles.htm

    REPORTS ON THE IPR PROBLEM

    http://www.brameur.co.uk/vasari7magnets/wp4/section4

    VASARI PROJECT

    http://mosaic.infobyte.it/project/project.html

    MOSAIC WEB PAGE


    1.4 Applicable Documents

    • Work Package 1100: SURVEY on the STATE of the ART
    • Work Package 1100 (SUMMARY): SURVEY on the STATE of the ART Summary
    • Work Package 1300: Partner Research and Economical Agreement Definition
    • Work Package 1400: Target Users Profile Specifications
    • Work Package 1400 (SUMMARY): Target Users Profile Specifications Summary
    • Work Package 1500: Requirements Definition Document
    • Work Package 1500 (SUMMARY): Requirements Definition Summary
    • Work Package 1600: Technical note on Application Reuse
    • Work Package 1600 (SUMMARY): Technical note on Application Reuse
    • Work Package 1700: Architectural Document
    • Work Package 1700 (SUMMARY): Architectural Document Summary
    • Work Package 1800: Dissemination of Results

    ref. http://mosaic.infobyte.it/project/project.html

    1.5 Document Structure

    As previously described the planning and development of the MOSAIC project must be inserted and integrated in the current technological and economic development scenario, with particular reference to the cultural heritage sector in its different promotion, fruition, management and valorization components.

    It is of utmost importance that the entire planning of the MOSAIC system is on line with market demand shown by the different user targets and, parallel, takes into consideration the technological, service and marketing characteristics of the current competing offer and the obvious one in the immediate future.

    As known, the technologically advanced sectors continually modify market characteristics, varying the business models even after a few months. In these sectors the risk of producing services and products which are born obsolete and outdated is very high.

    It is therefore indispensable to think of the research project’s development process open and orientated towards the market. The latter is able to adapt and modify itself according to both the variation in tastes and demand as well as to the variations in the technological scenarios within which it operates.

    Consequently the priority role that the analysis of the market, in its different components and exceptions, will have is obvious.

    The main objectives of the market study may be summarized as follows:

    1. Qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the response of the potential market to the services and products offered by the MOSAIC project;
    2. Emphasize the gaps between needs and expectancies of the market and the offer of the Project via a continuous monitoring of the sector both at national as well as international level;
    3. Find the areas and the cultural heritage which present the more appropriate characteristics for an insertion in the MOSAIC system;
    4. Elaborate one or more feasibility studies for the use of the produced technology and service by new firms to evaluate the degree of transferability of the system and find the profit levels;
    5. Define the more appropriate business models for the commercial exploitation of the system and define the possible financial plans.

    The actions which will be taking place will be:

    1. The analysis and monitoring of the market for demand and supply;
    2. The economic-financial feasibility study of the transferability of the system to small and medium-sized firms (the CSC).

    The analysis will be divided into a number of sections:

    The estimate and evaluation of the potential demand of the offered services; monitoring of the sector with particular regard to the potential alternative and competing technologies; identification of the type of services (cultural interactive and assisted entertainment, joint artistic themes, joint territorial themes) and personalized products (CD-ROMs, DVD, other multimedia products, videos, multimedia postcards) with a greater market demand and able to stimulate a greater demand; find possible new entrepreneurs. With particular reference to young qualified people (preferably in economic, scientific and computer studies) and graduates in scientific-economic, computer, literature subjects; people graduating in the same subjects; qualified people in art. The objective is to stimulate young people, with a very important endowment but not specific, to become managers of cultural heritage and activity.

    The work plan which will be adopted will be divided into the following parts:

    1. Analysis of the offered service in the local market and limited to one "type" of cultural good;
    2. Analysis of competitive strategies. The following aspects will be evaluated:
      • strategic areas;
      • strategic positioning;
      • competitive advantage;
      • marketing policies;
      • price policies;
      • promotional policies;
      • commercialization policies.
    3. Analysis of human resources and firm organization.
    4. Analysis of the costs of investment;
    5. Cost-benefit analysis for the service centers. The costs-benefit analysis for each service which will be elaborated will be useful to immediately, ex-ante, verify which are the more profitable activities and which ones have a greater element of risk. It is superfluous to underline the importance of this type information in the trial phase. The separate evaluation of each activity will allow even during the validation phase eventual adjustments in terms of functions, activity, programming, organization, etc.
    6. The provisional balance and financial plan.


    2. The Promoters of Mosaic

    2.1 Provide all relevant information to identify the promoters and qualify its ability to execute the project. This include its Legal status, Corporate Structure, Capital Structure, Organisation, Staff levels and Past experience in similar projects

    The Consortium has discovered a strong expectation from the cultural world (from different players in the cultural heritage). Following the line of MOU, we found many potential partners which are very interested as industry in sponsoring, institutional organizations for content provision, users (customers) interested in access to the content promoting artistic goods (large demand from owners of artistic goods), etc.…
    Technology Infrastructure are available, but a part of the content is still „missing". A facilitation of creating and managing new content is necessary. We will achieve it by increasing the capability to manage with institutional organizations. Shift of paradigm from centralized to cooperative (decentralized) approach - network aspect.
    The creation of new areas and economic flows around the valorization of cultural heritage could determine an anomalous and opposing trend phenomenon. In this case there is the possibility that the introduction of new value added technologies could increase employment instead of reducing it (something that occurs almost everywhere in other applicational sectors). For this reason we believe that MOSAIC by creating new services, can give the opportunity for new jobs.

    The choice right from the beginning of the project is that of involving organizations and institutions with experience in the organization and management of services. The main part of the project is based on their ability to interact and build the starting point of the MOSAIC network. The entire attention has been placed in the proposed potential of the cultural heritage market and to find new actors interested in promotion and finding synergies.

    MOSAIC network is linked to advanced technology ISDN and ATM and its nodule points in technological and service management partners are: Infobyte of Roma, Politecnico of Milano, CINECA of Bologna (GARR and the University network, a consortium of colleagues of 13 Italian universities: Ancona, Bologna, Catania, Ferrara, Firenze, Modena, Padova, Parma, Siena, Trento, Udine, Venezia) ZGDV of Darmstadt (the network of the universities of Germany, Portugal and South America), La Cité de Scince, Sophia Antipolis (Nice), JCR of Graz, Japan (the private and university network) USA, Canada, Egypt and other countries. The broadcasting Centres can rely on the Banca di Roma distribution network (1200 branches open to the pubic) and 300.000 consumers of the experimental network ATM by Bell. Both in the ABI network (Italian banking Association) and with the board for Cultural Relations of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs have shown interest in becoming members in order to spread Italian cultural heritage through a diplomatic network abroad. Firstly through Italian Cultural Institutes and then through Italian Embassies and Consulates throughout the world. A technological agreement is going to be defined between MOSAIC and CHIN (Canadian Heritage Information Network).
    An interesting experiment will take place by the end of ’98 at the Shoenbrunn castle in Austria. The first MOSAIC Service Centres will be started so the products and services can be tested by the public. There are numerous industrial partners involved in the MOSAIC project, here are some of them: Hewlett Packard, Silicon Graphics Apple, France Telecom, Imation, Microsoft and Italtel. Hewlett Packard, in particular, will take part in the star up of the Image Server and the relative techniques of the management of images. Imation is taking part with its years of experience in the field of photography (Ferrania brand) and medical images whereas Italtel is participating with the setting up of network technology and user points.
    A relevant part of the interlocutors, contacted during the workshops, have already demonstrated a concrete attention to the MOSAIC project. The list of associations, companies, institutions contacted for MOSAIC is the following :

    Austria

    • Schloss Schoenbrunn
    • Österrechische National Bibliothek
    • AIT - Angewandte Informationstechnik - Graz
    • Associated of Hofburg
    • Albertina – Wien

    England

    • Virtual Presence Limited - Sale Cheshire
    • VASARI Enterprise ltd – London
    • Cambridge Management group

    France

    • Cité des Sciences et de l’Industrie - Paris
    • SIM TEAM - Paris
    • Fondation Sophia Antipolis
    • Club MITSA - Sophia Antipolis
    • Cryo-Networks – Paris

    Germany

    • ART+COM
    • Museum fur Antike Schiffahrt - Mainz
    • Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum - Mainz
    • Bildarchiv Preussicher Kulturbesitz - Mainz

    Italy

    • Accademia Massimo - Roma
    • AIACE - International Association of Computing in Archaeology
    • Apple Italia – Milano
    • Archivio Centro di Catalogazione Beni Culturali Villa Manin - Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia
    • Archivio Storico Bulgarini d'Elci
    • Archivio Storico Diocesano di Milano
    • Associazione Bancaria Italiana – Roma
    • Bancaria Editrice – Roma
    • Biblioteca Capitolare di Verona
    • Canadian Embassy of Rome
    • Cap Gemini Italia S.p.A.
    • Capware – Ottaviano, Napoli
    • CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
    • Cooperativa archeologia, s.c.r.l. per la valorizzazione del patrimonio culturale - Firenze
    • Ente Interregionale - Progetto Europeo "Herity" - Roma
    • Fondazione Antonio Mazzotta – Milano
    • Fondazione Longhi - Firenze
    • Fondazione Ricci Oddi, Piacenza
    • Fondazione San Paolo di Torino
    • Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Moderna - Roma
    • Istituto Italiano per l'Industria Culturale - Roma
    • ITALTEL S.p.A. – Milano
    • Luiss - Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali
    • Marsilio Editore - Venezia
    • Mediatech, Roma
    • Ministero Affari Esteri – Roma
    • Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali - Sopraintendenza per i beni ambientali e storici per l'Abruzzo, L'Aquila.
    • Musei Capitolini - Antiquarium Comunale - Roma
    • Museo dell’Orto Botanico - Roma
    • Nautilus – Capri
    • Progetti Museali S.p.A.
    • Progetto: "I Musei Virtuali della Certosa di Calci". Progetto concordato tra lo Studio ZYX, la Soprintendenza B.A.A.A.S. di Pisa
    • Provincia di Milano, Assessorato alla Cultura e Tempo Libero
    • Regione Lombardia, Assessorato alla Cultura e Trasparenza – Milano
    • Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Centro Ricerche Informatiche per i Beni Culturali
    • Silicon Graphics - Milano
    • Sovraintendenza delle Antichità e Belle Arti del Comune di Roma
    • TELECOM ITALIA
    • Università degli studi di Pisa. Supportato dal Comune di Calci e dalla Provincia di Pisa
    • Università degli Studi di Trieste - Dipartimento EI – Trieste
    • Università di Padova - Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informatica

    Portugal

    • Centro de Computacao Grafica – Coimbra
    • Universidade Do Minho – Retoria
    • Museu Regional De Arqueuologia D. Diogo De Sousa – Braga
    • Universidade de Tras-os-montes e Alto Douro

    Sweden

    • Göteborg University - Department of Environmental Science and Conservation - Institute of Conservation
    • Metimur Company (technical Partner)

    Spain

    • Centro de Estudios del Patrimonio – Madrid
    • University of Jaén
    • Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona
    • Universidad Autonoma de Palma de Mallorca
    • Ministerio de la Cultura – Madrid
    • Museo Nacional de la Ciencia y de la Tecnologia – Madrid

    Europe

    • Hewlett Packard Europe (Belgium)
    • Imation S.p.A (borne of 3M Innovation)
    • Microsoft Europe
    • National Technical Museum - Prague

    Rest of the World
    • R.I.T.S.E.C. - Regional Information Technology and Software Engineering Center - Egypt
    • CRC Research Institute Inc.
    • SUMS (System for Universal Media Searching) project - G7 - Toronto - Canada
    • Guggenheim Museum - NY (USA)
    • CAD Center Corporation
    • CALTECH - CA (USA -G7 partner)
    • Capital Normal University - Beijing - PR of China
    • CHIN Canadian Heritage Information Network
    • Xerox Palo Alto Research Center - Palo Alto CA – USA
    • Lighscape Inc. - San Jose CA – USA
    • Multigen Inc. - Palo Alto – USA
    • Microsoft Reseach Centre - Redmond WA – USA
    • AMICO – USA

    All the partners in the MOSAIC consortium have subscribed to the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of the European Union dedicated to the promotion of access to European cultural heritage through multi-media.

    The project organisation configuration for the future evolution, at the moment, is consequently the following:

    Coordinator

    Banca di Roma

     

    Austria

    CSC Schloss Schoenbrunn

    CSC Graz

    P.O. of DISET

    Pole leader and contractor – JRC and AIT

    France

    CSC Paris

    CSC Sophia Antipolis

    Pole leader and Contractor - Cité des Sciences et de l’Industrie
    Pole leader and Contractor - Foundation Sophia Antipolis
    P.O.: Cryo-Networks – Paris and Arenotech - Paris

    Germany

    CSC – Pole leader and contractor

    Contractor - ART+COM
    ZGDV

    P.O. : Centro de Computacao Grafica – Coimbra

    Italy

    CSC Milano

     

     

     

     

     

     

    CSC Bologna

     

     

     

     

    CSC Rome

    Pole leader and Contractor – DISET
    P.O. – without founding - Fondazione Antonio Mazzotta – Milano, Fondazione Ricci Oddi, Piacenza , Fondazione San Paolo di Torino, Italtel SPA, Provincia di Milano, Assessorato alla Cultura e Tempo Libero, Regione Lombardia, Assessorato alla Cultura e Trasparenza – Milano, Silicon Graphics – Milano, Archivio Storico Diocesano di Milano , Hewlett Packard Europe (Belgium)
    P.O. - Università degli Studi di Trieste - Dipartimento EI – Trieste, Imation S.p.A (borne of 3M Innovation)

    Pole Leader and Contractor – Cineca
    3rd party - AIACE - International Association of Computing in Archaeology
    P.O. - Università di Bologna - Department of Historical Disciplines
    P.O. – without funding – Comune di Bologna,OCCAM-UNESCO
    Pole leader - IBY - Contractor IBY and BDR
    3rd party - CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Progetti Museali S.p.A., MUSA
    P.O. – without founding - Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Moderna – Roma, Istituto Italiano per l'Industria Culturale - Roma , Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali - Sopraintendenza per i beni ambientali e storici per l'Abruzzo, L'Aquila, Musei Capitolini - Antiquarium Comunale – Roma , Museo dell’Orto Botanico – Roma, Sovraintendenza delle Antichità e Belle Arti del Comune di Roma, R.I.T.S.E.C. - Regional Information Technology and Software Engineering Center – Egypt, CRC Research Institute Inc., Guggenheim Museum - NY (USA), CAD Center Corporation

    Portugal

    CSC

    Pole leader and Contractor - Consortium Geira
    (IPM+UM+UTAD) Museu Regional De Arqueuologia D. Diogo De Sousa – Braga, Universidade de Tras-os-montes e Alto Douro

    Sweden

    CSC

    Pole leader and Contractor - Göteborg University - Department of Environmental Science and Conservation - Institute of Conservation
    3rd party - Metimur Company (technical Partner)

    Spain

    CSC

    Pole leader and Contractor - Centro de Estudios del Patrimonio – Madrid

    The following table illustrates the Legal form, Organization type, the staff number and the role in the project of the MOSAIC partners:

    Organisation

    Legal Form

    Organization Type

    Number of Employees

    Partner Role

    Past Experiences

    Banca di Roma

    SpA

    Financial Entities

    20823

    Coordinator

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Zentrum fur Graphische Datenverarbeitung e.V

    Registered Association

    IT industry and Services

    50

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro

    Public University

     

    >1000

     

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Universidade do Minho

    Public University

     

    1500

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Museu D. Diogo de Sousa / IPM Instituto Portogues de Museus

         

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Centro De Estudios Del Patrimonio, S.A

    Limited company

    Services

    4

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Università di Bologna Dipartimento di Discipline Storiche

       

    77

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    CINECA-Consorzio Interuniversitario per la Gestione del Centro di Calcolo Elettronico dell’Italia Nord Orientale

       

    122

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Centro de Computação Gráfica

    Private

    Others

    25

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Cryo on Line

    Public Company

    Telematic/Content Supply

    30

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Fondation Sophia Antipolis

    Foundation

    Telematic/Content Supply

    8

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Cite Des Sciences Et De L’industrie

    Epic

    Others

    1097

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Joanneum Research

    GmbH

    Others

    287

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    AIT Ltd. – Applied Informationtechnique Limited

    Company Limited

    IT industry

    4

    Participating
    Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Art-Education-Nouvelle Technologies

    Association

    Others

     

    Participating
    Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    ART+COM Medientechnologie und Gestaltung

    GmbH

    Others

    39

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Università di Trieste-Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica,Elettronica ed Informatica

    University

    Others

    3000

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Institute of Conservation, Goteborg University

    Public

    Others

    20

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Infobyte

    SpA

    IT industry

    45

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Imation Europe B.V.

    B.V.

    IT industry

    3087

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Politecnico di Milano - DISET

    Public University

    Administration

    1703

    Contractor

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

    Schloss Schoenbrunn

    Private company

    Telematic/content supply

     

    Participating Organisation

    See annex Mosaic Company Profile

     

     

    3. Mosaic Scope and Objectives

    3.1Provide a summary description of the Project. Describe its objectives

    MOSAIC project is one European element for the development of cultural services and products through networks in the International global market. MOSAIC is basically the product of two networks: a telematic network and a physical distribution network spread across countries. The telematic network is made up of meshes with different performance levels from ATM to ADSL via internet and ISDN. The telematic network is the heart of the project: it provides a wide range of excellent services and performs a basic communication channel between nodes supplying contents and the various types of users.
    MOSAIC is a new approach to organisation, maintenance and promotion of historical and artistic heritage. Interactive avant-garde technology, multi-media and telecommunications applied to all forms of art in museums, galleries, architectural pieces.
    Our European cultural heritage is unique. We have a huge amount of art: from graffiti to affreschi, architectural pieces to urban landscapes not to mention craftwork.
    Strange as it may seem, this is one of the causes of the problems of European artistic heritage, especially in Italy. Advanced technology could solve some of the problems that our cultural heritage is facing: the lack of space open to the public, the lack of infrastructure, the cost of restoration, maintenance and all costs involved in the up-keep of art, exhibition space and education. Moreover, all those lovely paintings and art pieces hidden in private homes and stored away out of view can finally be seen by everybody with the help of technology.

     

     

     

     

    The main goal of MOSAIC is to facilitate access to the cultural heritage of European Countries and to promote encounters and exchanges between cultural operators and users.
    MOSAIC shall create an integrated system on culture institutions (museums, libraries, photo-archives,… ) and users (specialists, researchers, tourists, tourist operators, adept employees,…) that shall be Cultural Service Centre (CSC) capable to facilitate meetings between agent entities and users with an added value.
    These institutions and users are presently two macrocosms disjointed or casually integrated. For this reason there exists a flow detachment between inquiries and requests.
    It is, therefore, mandatory to define an intermediate layer of interconnection that can make the system truly inter-operable (Cultural Service Centre).

    Cultural Integrated System General Schema

    Like the ganglions of a nervous system, the Cultural Service Centres know the semantic rules of primary users (multi-lingual and inter-operability) and satisfy the most sophisticated inquires (theme of research), within the cultural dimensional parameters: heritage period, multi-subject (pictorial, archaeological, bibliographical,.. ), with a multimedia response (image+ text+photo+ ...).

    Main goals of Mosaic are:

    • Idealise an integrated and inter-operable system capable of satisfying the most varied information requirements on the cultural heritage patrimony sector.
    • Creating an integrated system on culture entails individualising a series of agent entities (museums, libraries, photo-archive,.. ) and of users (specialists, researchers, students, tourists, tourist operators, adept employees,..) and the cultural service centres capable of facilitating and meeting agents entity and users with an added value.
    • The agent entities and the users are today two macrocosms disjointed or casually integrated. For this reason exists a flow detachment between inquiries and requests.
    • It is, therefore, mandatory to define an intermediate layer of interconnection that can make the system truly inter-operable (cultural service centre).
    • The user requirement definition process and the implementation of primary ganglions of the integrated system make-up the innovative elements of this proposal.
    4. The Services and the Marketing Approach

    4.1 Describe the services that will be provided

    The WP 1700 – Architectural Document contains a detailed description of the involved technologies and Mosaic services. Here a list of the main services is presented:

    • basic network
    • video-conferencing
    • virtual reality room (vision room)
    • delivery of cultural derived product
    • tutorial tours in digital museums
    • multi-linguistic thesaurus
    • creation of virtual exhibitions not related to a real one
    • cultural events management and promotion

    The objective is to establish a technical, operation and commercial basis for trans-European electronic access which ensures:

    • better visibility for cultural wealth and openness to the public;
    • extension of real exhibition space to virtual-cyber space;
    • efficient information interchange amongst homologous institutions across Europe and amongst organisation and researchers;
    • need to create and consolidate a distributed work of art data base able to manage and locate each item across Europe;
    • need to define a standard format, based on 'de facto' status , for information systems in order to access and exchange data from different locations;
    • elaboration of multilingual presentations;
    • need to enrich and integrate actual 'back stage' museums information systems in order to provide information to the public both on site and home;
    • need to design and realise a framework to organise and deliver information to the public;
    • creation of new skills and working places;
    • promotion and dissemination of European cultural heritage as a common basis of interest and development;
    • the preparation of high-quality publications, exhibitions, conferences and other events.

    In the specific sector of information technology for museums and galleries the objective is to establish a solution which ensures:

    • openness and inter-operability of access systems;
    • the widest possible access, through data communication over switched telephony as well as over high-speed cable and fibre networks;
    • the possibility for museums, galleries and libraries to charge modest fees for access and reproduction of information and images, but the possibility to offer free access from schools and universities;
    • proper protection of intellectual property rights and copyright, with operational mechanism for controlling and charging for commercial re-use of material;
    • a balance between scientific and academic interest in museum/gallery collections or libraries and generic public interest.
    • possibility to access information both from the museum and directly from home;
    • possibility to create a trans-European network of "Cultural Wealth Information Providers" in order to sell high quality documents (high quality colour prints, 3D digital or solid models);
    • possibility to obtain a geographical or historical path or map related to an author or movement;
    • possibility to offers not only 2d low and high resolution images but also movie-maps, 3d models, VR experiences, digital animation and reconstruction (archeology, not yet completed, totally or partially destroyed work of art)
    • tutorial tours in digital museums;
    • hyper-media navigation and surfing trough different kind of work of art and information (architecture, sculpture, paintings, frescos etc.)
    • creation of 'virtual' exhibitions not related to the real one (collection of disseminated works of art, etc).
    • the possibility for scholars and researchers to connect and access to cultural heritage and educational information and images stored in libraries and bibliothèque in order to learn and teach with modern instruments at a modest or even free charge.

    4.2 Describe the Users of the Services. The users are the Organisations or the individuals that will be using and paying for the services

    A great deal of effort has gone into defining the users and their needs. Solutions are made ad-hoc to meet the diverse demands of museums and end users in Europe.
    MOSAIC proposes a series of essential services between suppliers (museums, art galleries, public offices in charge of historical heritage) and end users, whether they are experts, novices, researchers or just casual visitors. There are two overlapping networks. The first is an advanced telecommunication capillary network that transfers data between museums and the public. The second is the network of pilot Centres where users have access to services such as video rooms, high quality prints, virtual reality and a pay-per-print service for catalogues and documents. Thanks to the good workability of the network, services can be offered using infrastructures that are already installed An added advantage is that advanced technology Cultural Service Centres (video-conferences, WEB server, virtual reality etc.) create jobs and generate funds through the sale of products and services to third parties. A series of Centres, or clusters, are set up to serve this very purpose within the network system.

    The following tables will summarize the Users categories in term of profiles and needs.

     

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    openness and inter-operability of access systems

             

    widest possible access, through data communication over switched telephony as well as over high-speed cable and fibre networks

             

    museums, galleries and libraries could charge modest fees for access and reproduction of information and images, but the possibility to offer free access from schools and universities

             

    proper protection of intellectual property rights and copyright, with operational mechanisms for controlling and charging for commercial re-use of material

             

    balanced between scientific and academic interest in museum/gallery collections or libraries and generic public interest.

             

    accesses information both from the museum and directly from home

             

    create a trans-European network of "Cultural Wealth Information Providers" in order to sell high quality documents (high quality color prints, 3D digital or solid models)

             

    obtain a geographical or historical path or map related to an author or movement

             

    offer not only 2D low and high resolution images but also movie-maps, 3D models, VR experiences, digital animation and reconstruction (archaeology, not yet completed, totally or partially destroyed work of art)

             

    tutorial tours in digital museums

             

    hyper-media navigation and surfing trough different kind of work of art and information (architecture, sculpture, paintings, frescos etc.)

             

    creation of 'virtual' exhibitions not related to the real one (collection of disseminated works of art, etc)

             

     

    Users A Users B Users C Uses D Users E
    • Museums, Universitie, Professors, Researcher, Students, Scholars
  1. Art Restorators
  2. Cultural Associations, Local Entities for the Protection of the Community, Linguistic Reasons, Thematic Museums
  3. Photographers, Scenographers, Directors and/or TV Producers
  4. Curators, Authors, Scenographers, etc
  5. Manufacturing Companies, Advertising Agencies, Sponsors, Public Relations
  6. Children of ages 3-5
  7. Toddlers and Teenagers
  8. Artists, Technicians, Advertisements
  9. Sponsors
  10. Image Agencies
  11. Merchandise Producers
  12. Art Brokers
  13. Archive Managers (Libraries, Museums, Music-tech, Historical Register Office, State Archives)
  14. Cultural Tourist
  15. Disabled Cultural Tourists
  16. Tourist Operators/Agencies
  17. Interpol/Police Force
  18. A list of tables containing description of users characteristics and their needs is on documents Target Users Profile (WP1400, Paragraph 3.1. ref. http://mosaic.infobyte.it/project/project.html )

    The technical Mosaic framework can be presented in terms of client fronted (application) and server organisation (infrastructures):

    local USER

    Applications

    Tele-conference, object manipulation, smart card, ecash, Search&Retrieval, data entry, network navigation, IT-services

    Access to physical space: Training Room, Video Conference, Virtual Theatre, Multimedia Room, CyberCafé, Marketing Area, Workshop

    Network Access

    Internal Network Services and External Front-end

     

    USER/CSC Network

    Applications

    Email, file-transfer, web-access, S&R, ECMS, ecash, newslist, Cultural on-line browser

    Network Access

    Pop3, SMTP, FT8, http, Z39.59, listserver, Corba, ODBC

     

    CSC/CSC Network

    Applications

    OPAC-provision, database, maintenance, ECMS, accounting, digitalisation

    Network Access

    Virtual collection, 3D models for exhibition, ISDN/ATM-trasmission, real audio/video IPR

     

    4.3 Describe the Demand for the Services to be Provided and expected competition

    According to 1995 data published by the World Tourism Organization with main offices in Madrid, the world volume of the international tourist movement at the end on 1995 was of 567 million people generating US$372 billion in net foreign exchange (transport costs not included).
    The growth in the two values does not however follow the same trend: since international flights have been made accessible to the public the average rate of increase of tourist activity has been 7.6% as far as international arrivals are concerned and 12.7% for revenue from tourism in local exchange. One can therefore forecast that in the year 2000 international arrivals will be 668.9 million while the foreign exchange will presumably reach US$475 billion.
    The propensity to tourist consumption increases more rapidly also because influenced by other factors which are not directly correlated with tourism such as:

    • increase in average age and average age of those who get married
    • increase in women workers, single people, family income, days of paid holiday, possibility to travel (decrease in costs).
    According to an ENIT (Italian Bureau of Tourism) analysis the demand for cultural services is made up of a universe of around 25 million people and this figure increases by nearly one million visitors each year (3.6%). To this figure we can also add that the rise of entrances is nearly totally made up of paying visitors which has increase more than 8% compared to those free entrance visitors (0.5%).

    Anologous results are in Italian Cultural Heritage Departent: for example the number of paying peoples in Italian Museums in period 1997 respect 1996 is increased of 9% ref.http://www.beniculturali.it/anno_97.html

    A recent study on the archeological area of Pompei (see ICOM acts) has demonstrated that a rise in the free entrance days/week would not have significantly increased revenue unlike an improvement in the services of the cultural good to the consumer.

    One other aspect is the needs to improve the visiting time and related revenue in the artistic sites. For example some period of the year or some visit duration could be increased by using CSC services opened to the public with added value services. Some figure could be considered, but are really related to the sites organisation and promotion.

    Significative statistics about number of visitor to museum can be found at web site of Ministero dei Beni Culturali (Italian Department of Cultural Wealth) ref. http://www.beniculturali.it/indstat.html

    1. Number of visitor in museums in 1985-1997
    2. Number of vistors in museums in 1997
    3. Number of visitors in top 20 museum in 1997
    4. Number of visitors in top 20 museum in may 1998
    5. Number of visitors in top 20 museum in june 1998
    6. Number of visitors in top 20 museum in july1998
    7. Number of visitors in top 20 museum in august1998

    Data contained in 2 show increment of 9% for paying people and 7% in revenues, period 1997 respect 1996. Data contained in 3 shows increment of 10% of presence for paying and free admitted peoples. Data contained in 7, period august 1998 respect august 1997, shown increment of 6% for paying and free admitted peoples and increment of 10% in revenues.

    Other statistic can be obtained from annual visitors to San Marino

    Daily entrances in a typical museum of 1500 m2 (50% exhibition, 50% services)

    According to recent poll (Touring Club Italiano) seven tourists out of every ten choose Italy for its art and culture but 49% complain of the lack of information and 32.7% about reduced opening hours and receptive structures. Only 52% of the museums is open to the public and a third only following a specific request.

    The following graphs show the limits of the Italian museum offer.

    International tourism is therefore a world phenomenon: in 1995 1,500,000 people a day left their country to spend an average of US$650 for accommodation, food, entertainment and shopping. The tourist flow is mainly in Europe and the Americas which absorb 80% of the entire market but the European quota (ENIT data) has decreased from 68.8% in 1980 to 59.6% in 1994. This fact demonstrates that there is still a margin of growth (recovery) for the market particularly cultural tourism where Europe has an enormous structural advantage. According to a research of the economist Stefano Gorelli of Rome University the demand to see the Italian cultural heritage depends on the number of foreigners and follows the tourist flow. This is show by the significant difference between Italy and other high income countries as far as demand for museum visiting by residents is concerned.

    Rates of participation of residents in Museums and Galleries
     Museums Galleries
    Italy6.2%5.7%
    USA22.0%22.0%
    Great Britain29.0%19.0%
    Spain30.0%15.0%
    France30.0%15.0%
    Sweden12.0%30.0%

    The places of culture (museums, monuments, archeological sites, libraries and historic archives, etc.), the main goal of this type of tourism, are certainly the heart of the system which, however, has to also include hotels, restaurants, welcoming places, transport, flow organization and management mechanisms, etc., in general all those components which improve the quality-price ratio of the offered system.

    Available financing for 1998-2000 (in billions of lire)
    (source Italian Cultural Heritage Ministry)
    Ordinary resources1955
    allocations of competence1306
    allocation financial budget649
      
    Extraordinary resources 2185
    Midweek lottery900
    European Union Funds60
    Deliberation Cipe 12/7/1996200
    Laws for Jubilee780
    Mixed firms400
    Security plan200
      
    Total4140

    The Heritage UK market analysis below gives a rough indication on forecast and likely funds available to Internet, multimedia and VR technology projects. Source information is from the National Lottery Annual Report & Accounts 1995/6 they have been used to estimate the percentage of funds available to technology based projects.

    • Millennium Fund - £800m 10% of Fund Approx. spend =£80m - Growth
    • Heritage Fund - £800m 4% of Fund Approx. spend = £32m - Rapid
    • Arts Fund - £800m 8% of Fund Approx. spend = £64m - Emerging
    • Sports Fund - £800m 2% of Fund Approx. spend = £16m - Restricted

    The figures sketch the potential of the Lottery market (total of £192 million) calculated over a three-year period, June 1997 to 2001. The majority of technology spend is likely to occur during late 1998 through to 2001 once the infrastructure and building projects are completed.

    The Italian Department of Cultural Wealth as in others european countries has decided to assign the revenue of national lottery to favorite and promote innovation on cultural wealth. The estimated revenue from 1999 is about 150 MECU/year. The following table summaries the situation in Italy:

    Additional financing

    (ECU)

    Lotto lottery

    150.000.000

    CIPE grants

    100.000.000

    0.8 % grants

    15.000.000

    CEE grants

    19.000.000

    Jubilee 2000 (1997- 1999)

    163.500.000

    Total

    447.500.000

    ref.http://www.beniculturali.it/bilancio.html

    MOSAIC’s main objective is to make art available to the public. It will encourage cultural exchange between countries in Europe and the rest of the world. This is fundamental because recent studies (Eurobarometer 09/97) have shown that the number of visitors from Japan and America interested in our art is far greater than the 28% of Europeans interested in getting ‘on line’ to view art.

    Considering the fact that the first step of the CSC services is manly based on the network dissemination of existing cultural application, we have put our attention to the Internet world of users. The following figures illustrates how the Internet can offer an easy way to get wired with the system.

    Use, & Interested in Using, Various Access Systems to the Information Society (at Home):

    System

    % Use

    % Interested

    % Total

    Highest Use

    Lowest Use

    Video Recorder

    74

    7

    81

    UK, S, Irl

    P, GR, D

    Teletext

    49

    13

    62

    S, DK, NL

    GR, F, P

    Computer

    28

    22

    50

    NL, DK, S

    P, GR, F

    Cable TV

    26

    19

    45

    NL, L, B

    I, GR, E

    Satellite Dish

    16

    23

    39

    A, D, S

    B, GR, F

    CD-ROM

    15

    24

    39

    DK, S, NL

    P, GR, Irl

    Mobile Phone

    17

    21

    38

    S, Fin, DK

    P, F, GR

    Pay-TV Decoder

    13

    21

    34

    F, UK, S

    P, NL,GR

    Internet/www

    4

    24

    38

    S, NL, Fin

    P, E, GR

    Fax (stand alone)

    7

    18

    25

    S, L, NL

    P, E, Irl

    Fax (computer linked)

    6

    19

    25

    S, DK, Fin

    P, GR, E

    Minitel-type Videotext

    7

    13

    20

    F, A, Fin

    GR, E, P

    Phono Pager

    2

    11

    13

    S, NL, B

    GR, I, D

    Source : Compiled from "Eurobarometer", number 47.0

    Use, & Interested in Using, at Home - The Internet/www, by country:

    Country

    % Use

    % Interested

    % Total

    Sweden

    18

    32

    50

    Finland

    9

    35

    44

    Denmark

    9

    31

    40

    The Netherands

    11

    24

    35

    Luxembourg

    8

    26

    34

    Italy

    3

    28

    31

    Spain

    2

    28

    30

    UK

    6

    23

    29

    Ireland

    3

    25

    28

    Portugal

    2

    26

    28

    EU Average

    4,4

    24

    28

    France

    2

    24

    26

    Greece

    2

    23

    25

    Belgium

    3

    21

    24

    Germany

    4

    19

    23

    Austria

    5

    10

    15

    Source : Compiled from "Eurobarometer", number 47.0

    Socio-Economic Characteristics of Internet/ www Users, & Interested Users, at Home
       

    % Use

    % Interested

    % Total

    A. Sex

    Male

    5

    29

    34

     

    Female

    3

    19

    22

             

    B. Age

    15-24

    8

    43

    51

     

    25-39

    6

    32

    38

     

    40-54

    4

    21

    25

     

    55+

    2

    7

    9

             

    C. Full-time Education

    to 15

    1

    10

    11

     

    16-19

    4

    22

    25

     

    20+

    8

    33

    41

     

    Still studying

    10

    56

    66

             

    D. Occupation

    Self-

    8

    25

    32

     

    employed

         
     

    Managers

    9

    36

    45

     

    White collars

    5

    32

    37

     

    Manual

    3

    22

    25

     

    House Persons

    2

    12

    14

     

    Unemployed

    3

    12

    14

             

    E. Income

    Lowest

    2

    18

    20

     

    Low

    3

    19

    22

     

    High

    4

    28

    32

     

    Highest

    9

    29

    38

             
    Source : Compiled from "Eurobarometer", number 47.0

     

    The following table illustrates the number of existing Web pages in EU countries :

    Country

    Number of Hosts

    Number of Web pages

    Web pages per host

    Germany

    721,847

    3,819,986

    5,3

    UK

    591,624

    3,815,330

    6,4

    Italy

    149,595

    2,319,170

    15,5

    France

    245,501

    1,516,092

    6,2

    Sweden

    232,955

    1,299,317

    5,6

    Netherlands

    270,521

    1,204,293

    4,5

    Finland

    283,526

    1,164,855

    4,1

    Spain

    110,041

    719,811

    6,6

    Belgium

    64,607

    559,766

    8,7

    Austria

    91,938

    459,100

    5,0

    Denmark

    106,476

    451,922

    4,2

    Greece

    15,925

    202,988

    12,7

    Portugal

    26,077

    193,041

    7,4

    Ireland

    27,058

    184,743

    6,8

    Luxembourg

    3,506

    30,139

    8,6

    Total EU

    2,941,198

    17,940,463

    6,1

    Source :Databank Consulting

    and for the percentage of multi-language web sites (starting from 400 European sites nearly exclusively commercial ) the results are:

    • 34% of Web sites are in the local language only
    • 29% of Web sites are in English only
    • 30% of Web sites in the local language and English
    • 7% of Web sites are in multiple languages in addition to English and the local language
    • only two Web sites in two languages, neither of which was in English

    also :

    • 64% of Web sites have some English pages
    • 19% of web sites have some French pages
    • 8% of Web sites have some Spanish pages
    • 7% of Web sites have some Italian pages
    • 3% of Web sites have some German pages
    (does not add to 100% because of multiple language sites) Source : [Databank Consulting]

    Interest in using Internet for various services
     

    % Interested

    % Willing to pay 10 ECU per month

    No. of people (millions) willing to pay 10 ECU per month

    Multi-Media access to museum collections using email

    28

    7

    19

    Source : Compiled from "Eurobarometer", number 47.0

    Interest in using the Internet for On-line Museum Visits by Country

    Country

    % Interested

    Italy

    39

    Sweden

    38

    Spain

    34

    Portugal

    34

    Greece

    31

    France

    29

    Finland

    29

    Luxembourg

    29

    EU Average

    28

    The Netherlands

    27

    Denmark

    27

    UK

    23

    Austria

    23

    Belgium

    22

    Ireland

    21

    Germany

    18

    Source : Compiled from "Eurobarometer", number 47.0

    Socio-Economic characteristics of those willing to pay an Ecu 10 monthly subscription fee for on-line access to museums:
       

    % Willing

    A. Sex

    Male

    8

     

    Female

    8

         

    B. Age

    15-24

    9

     

    25-39

    9

     

    40-54

    9

     

    55+

    5

         

    C. Full-time Education

    to 15

    3

     

    16-19

    7

     

    20+

    15

     

    Still studying

    23

         

    D. Occupation

    Self-

     
     

    employed

    11

     

    Managers

    14

     

    White collar

    9

     

    Manual

    6

     

    House persons

    5

     

    Unemployed

    8

         
         

    E. Income

    Lowest

    4

     

    Low

    8

     

    High

    9

     

    Highest

    12

         
    Source : Compiled from "Eurobarometer", number 47.0

    The major considerations that can be resumed are the following:

    • Access Systems
      • 28% use PCs at Home (22% interested)
      • 15% have CD-Roms (24% interested)
      • Internet usage low (4%), but interested high (24%)
      • Scandinavian & Benelux countries have highest use (and interest) in the Internet

    • Internet / WWW users in the EU are predominantly
      • Male
      • Young
      • Highly educated & still studying
      • Managers & White Collar Workers
      • & have high incomes

    • On-Line Museum Visits
      • 28% are interested. 19 million people
      • Interest is highest in Southern Europe & Scandinavia
      • Most willing to pay are :
        • 25-54 years olds
        • Highly educated & still studying
        • Managers & self-employed
        • & have high incomes
      • Possible new revenue stream of 1 bn/ECU/year
    Source : [Databank Consulting]

    So far, MOSAIC has been the only project, financed by the EEC in the TEN-Telecom program (Trans European Networks Telecommunications), that is actively involved in and dedicated to our cultural heritage. The TEN-Telecom framework will, in this case, promote and support the creation of International networks for viewing art through multi-media.
    So, MOSAIC can be seen as an operative branch of the "Memorandum of Understanding" backed by the EEC. Already around one hundred museums and other operators in the field (around 400) have joined to create the biggest possible multi-media communication system.
    Mosaic represents a particular initiative as far as we didn’t see any other global project concerning both services and products on the field of cultural heritage already activated in a organized structure as this one.
    We could consider important projects as AMICO and CIMI but as far as we have already reach an agreement with them to cooperate in the field of cultural heritage we must consider them more as an integration of our project than a real competitor.

    4.4 Describe How the services will be marketed, including the pricing approach and expected market Share

    The communication strategy is devoted to the Mosaic project promotion and shall have the following objectives:

    • accreditate Mosaic beside the public institutions during the pre-marketing phase
    • accreditate Mosaic beside the wide public and the final users during the pre-marketing phase

    Mosaic is to be considered as a "product" to be lunched on the market during the developing phase to individuate:

    • product creation (first year premarketing-phase and trial). In this phase the Mosaic International Organisation shall tune the product and its knowledge to the European Community Institution and the extra community countries
    • lunch and support of the product (year 2 and 3, marketing and deployment phase). In this phase shall be realised the lunch of the Mosaic project and its expansion to the final users and the wide public

    During the two phases, the communication framework shall be the following:

    4.1.1 Phase 1 – Activities

    Advisory board

    It is mandatory to create an Advisory Board in the Mosaic International Organisation team, that accordingly to the Scientific committe shall represent all the components involved in the project. It is constituted of Curators and a representant of each partner (company or institution). The Advisory Board activity shall be done every two months and shall be coordinated by the Scientific Committe. Its main objectives are:

    • guarantee the correct project implementation
    • define the Mosaic products
    • diffusion of "key messages" during phase 1 and phase 2

    Preliminary audit

    A Preliminary audit with institutions (external audit) and with project developers (internal audit) shall be done to select the reference project targets. Audits shall collect interviews to define the project strategy, its priorities, targets and critical points.

    Project strategy

    With audits results the Mosaic International Organisation shall realise two sessions with the Advisory Board members. The two sessions shall define the "key messages" to be used in promotional and communication activities devoted to the project.

    Key Messages and spokesperson

    The Advisory Board member sessions shall individuate the "key messages" and the spokespersons to promote the product towards media or during events. Three persons shall be individuated from the Advisory Board. They shall follow a training course to be ready for project diffusion in meetings or towards media.

    Road shows

    A tour of meetings and conferences shall be organised in some european or extra-european towns with significative cultural traditions. To the meeting shall be invited institutional representative, jurnalists specialised in cultural heritage or arts. The target shall be the project diffusion to favor knowledge of the real and innovative project characteristics.

    Event

    Organisation of an "ad hoc" event to present the project its characteristics and functions and to the wide public (it could be a stand …)

    Press Office

    Realise a press conference to lunch phase 1 to diffuse the project towards european and extra-european media and the wide public. The pre