The European Community ("The Community") represented by the Commission of the European Communities ("The Commission") represented by the Director General for Telecommunications, Information Market and Exploitation of Research, or its authorised representative,
and
Banca di Roma s.p.a ("The Coordinator")("BDR") established in Italy
Joanneum Research - Forshungsgesellschaft mbH ("The Contractor")("JRC") established in Austria
Zentrum fur Graphische DatenVerarbeitung e.V ("The Contactor")("ZGDV") establisched in Germany
Cineca - Consorzio Interuniversitario per la Gestione Del Centro di Calcolo Elettronico dell’Italia Nord Occidentale ("the Contractor") ("CINECA") established in Italy
Politecnico di Milano, DIP.ISET ("The Contractor") ("DISET") established in Italy
Infobyte s.p.a ("The contractor") "INFOBYTE" established in Italy
(collectively "the contractor") represented by their authorized representatives,
Having regard to the Regulation (EC) n. 2236/95 of the Council of 18 September 1995 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of Trans European networks,
HAVE AGREED to a project called "MOSAIC" - Museum Over States and vIrtual Culture being carried out in the domain of Trans-European Telecommunications Networks- Integrated Services Digital network (TEN-ISDN) according to the following provisions.
Article -1 Scope
Article - 2 Duration
Article - 3 Reports
The reports shall be accompanied by cost statements, in the format specified in Part A of Annex II and within the limits laid down in Annex II. These statements shall cover the same period and be appended to each corresponding periodic progress reports.
Article 4 - Payment by the Commission
All money paid by the commission under this contract shall be taken into account in calculating the Commission contribution paid to the project and determining whether the commission has fulfilled the requirements of this Article
via M. Minghetti, 17 00187 - Roma
The Coordinator shall be responsible for immediately transferring the appropriate amount of the financial contribution of the Commission to each Contractor. The Coordinator shall not be the beneficial owner of any payment, except by agreement between the Contractors who shall agree appropriate arrangements concerning any transfer to the Coordinator’s own account
Article 5 - Third Party Assistance
Article 6 - Technical verification and Auditing
Article 7 - Ownership and exploitation of results
Article 8 - Liability
The contractors shall identify the Commission against any liability for any loss, damage or injury of any nature that they may cause or suffer in connection with execution of this contract
Article 9 - Termination of Contract
Article 10 - Confidentiality
The contractors undertake to keep confidential facts, information, knowledge, documents or other matters communicated to them as confidential during the performance of this contract
Article 11 - Amendments
This contract including its annexes may be modified only by a written agreement by duly authorised representatives of the contracting parties
Article 12 - Applicable Law, Entry into Force and Competent Court
Article 13 - Supervision of Contract
For the Commission : Yvan CAPOUET
BU29 7/20
Commission of the European Communities
DG XIII, Telecommunications, Information Market
and Exploitation of Research
200 rue de la Loi
B - 1049 BRUSSELS
BELGIUM
For the Contractors : Mr. Massimo Cilli
Banca di Roma S.p.a
ufficio Legale Servizio Sistemi e Comunicazioni
Via M. Minghetti 17
00187 - Roma
Article 14 - Provisions relating to Taxation
The amount of any indirect taxes, sales taxes or customs duties for any invoice or bill by a supplied exceeding ECU 2500 specific to the Project, and not directly recoverable by the participant, may be rembursed in addition to the Commuinty contribution in conformity with arrangements implementing the protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities enabling the Commission to recover such amount from a Member State.
Article 15 - Special Conditions
Article 3 of the contractor and Point 1 of Annex III shall be completed by the following : An annual review will be established at a time specified by the Commission. The Contractors will deliver an Annual Review Report on the previous years activities, including a critical self-evaluation, and a detailed plan for the following year. This report shall contain an evaluation of the results achieved with Community aid in the field of application, in terms of original objectives. This report can be evaluated by appropriate external experts. On the basis of the results of the annual review, the Commission will make a decision to continue, to modify or stop the project. A modification to the work content of the project, as well as the make-up of the partnership, may be included in this decision. Annex I will be amended if necessary
Article 16 - Annexes
The Annexes forming an integral part of this contract are :
- Annex I : Project Work Programme
- Annex II : Financial Annex
- Annex III : Reports
ANNEX I
PROJECT Work Programme
This Annex I includes the following documents:
|
Annex I.1 |
the description of the objectives of the project |
|
Annex I.2 |
the list of contractors involved in this contract (name of organisation, address, name and status of authorised representative) |
|
Annex I.3 |
the description of the project and of its workpackages including the description of the role, the tasks and the workload for each contractor |
|
Annex I.4 |
the breakdown of the cost of the project per category of costs and per contractor |
|
Annex I.5 |
the breakdown of the cost for each workpackage (per category of costs and per contractor ) |
|
Annex I.6 |
the breakdown of the cost for each intermediate payment (per category of costs and per contractor) |
Annex I.1
DESCRIPTION of the OBJECTIVES of the PROJECT
This project introduces to a new approach to organisation, maintenance and promotion in the field of art and museums. This approach is mainly based on a couple of cool interactive technologies: Hypermedia and Telecommunications and applies to museums, art galleries, architecture and other kinds of works of art.
Network access to museums and galleries offers both easier access to Europe's heritage and new revenue for its preservation and display from access and re-use fees.
European museums and galleries hold the richest collection of objects, art and cultural wealth than anywhere in the world, but much is not accessible to scholars and public because of lack of space and cost of travel. This is the reason why this 'Real Virtuality' aims to develop a trans-European framework for electronic network access to museums and galleries, classifying and showing not only what is shown to the public but in addition what is not visible because of lack of exhibition space or, what is not accessible to the public like frescos in access restricted buildings and private offices.
The main goal of this project is to improve the visibility of cultural heritage, to disseminate knowledge and cultural interchanges amongst nations. One of the fall-out of this project may be the availability of some fees for museums coming from network usage and information downloading.
The aim of the project is to promote co-operation in developing and rendering accessible the cultural heritage of European countries. This project will contribute to the development of, and to favour the access of the citizen to, the cultural heritage of European museums, emphasizing development and access to museums, by means of enhancing the cultural content of museum collections, with a view to render them accessible to the general public.
The objective is to establish a technical, operation and commercial basis for trans-European electronic access which ensures:
Annex I.2
LIST of Contractors
|
Role |
Organisation |
Name and status of authorised representative |
Address |
|
Coordinator
: |
BDR
|
Mr. Carmelo PETTINATO Representative |
41, av. Des Arts B-1040 Brussels Belgium |
|
Contractor
|
ZGDV
|
Prof. Jose L. Encarnacao Chairman of the Board
|
Zentrum fur Graphische Datenverarbeitung Wilhelminestr. 7 D-64283 Darmstadt Germany |
|
Contractor
|
JRC
|
Ing. Berghold BAYER director
|
Steyregasse 17 A-8010 Graz Austria |
|
Contractor
|
CINECA
|
Prof. Ing. Mario Rinaldi president CINECA and legal representative
|
Cineca/Supercalcolo via Magnanelli, 6/3 40033 Casalecchio di Reno (BO) Italy |
|
Contractor
|
INFOBYTE
|
dr. Bruno ANTINUCCI C.E.O. and legal representative
|
Infobyte S.p.A. Via della Camilluccia, 67 00135 Rome Italy |
|
Contractor
|
POLITECNICO DI MILANO- DISET
|
Prof. Adriano Di Maio Rettore
|
Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32 20133 Milan Italy |
|
Contractor |
ARENOTECH
|
Mr. André Jean-Marc LOECHEL Chairman
|
5, av. De l'Opera 75001 Paris France |
Annex I.3
1. Summary description of the project
The aim of the project is to promote co-operation in developing and rendering accessible the cultural heritage of European countries. This project will contribute to the development of, and to favour the access of the citizen to, the cultural heritage of European museums, emphasizing development and access to museums, by means of enhancing the cultural content of museum collections, with a view to render them accessible to the general public.
Idealise an integrated and inter-operable system capable of satisfying the most varied information requirements on the cultural heritage patrimony sector.
Creating an integrated system on culture entails individualising a series of agent entities (museums, libraries, photo-archive,.. ) and of users (specialists, researchers, students, tourists, tourist operators, adept employees,..) and the cultural service centres capable of facilitating and meeting agents entity and users with an added value.
The agent entities and the users are today two macrocosms disjoined or casually integrated. For this reason exists a flow detachment between inquiries and requests.
It is, therefore, mandatory to define an intermediate layer of interconnection that can make the system truly inter-operable (Cultural Service Centre).
The user requirement definition process and the implementation of primary ganglions of the integrated system make-up the innovative elements of this proposal.
The main service are:

The main requirement that we will consider is the following.

The user requirement definition process and the implementation of primary ganglions of the integrated system make-up the innovative elements of this proposal. In particular:
In the specific sector of information technology for museums and galleries the objective is to establish a solution which ensures:
In the feasibility study phase an analysis of the target user is foreseen. In fact, before to introduce a new service on the culture is very important to better outline the users expectation and needs. A preliminary list of users is, in any case, take into account in our commercial analysis (specialists, researchers, students, tourists, tourist operators, adept employees,..).
The cultural service centres can receive money for the provided services (subscription) or can sell cultural derived products like brochures, tickets, gadgets,..
The commercial rules are to be defined for the correct flow of cultural products inside the network according to the country’s law.

Creating an integrated system on culture entails individualising a series of agent entities (museums, libraries, photo-archive,.. ) and of users (specialists, researchers, tourists, tourist operators, adept employees,..) and the cultural service centres capable of facilitating and meeting agents entity and users with an added value.
The agent entities and the users are today two macrocosms disjoined or casually integrated. For this reason exists a flow detachment between inquiries and requests.
It is, therefore, mandatory to define an intermediate layer of interconnection that can make the system truly interoperable (cultural service centre).
As the ganglions of a nervous system the cultural service centres know the semantic rules of the primary users (multilingualism and interoperability) and satisfy the most sophisticated inquires (theme of research) inside to the cultural dimensional parameters: heritage period, multi-subject (pictorial, archaeological, bibliographical,.. ), .. with a multimedia response (image+ text+photo+ ...).
The cultural service centre knows how to get access to all the primary information sites (museum, libraries,..) through their specialised catalogue (Meta-database).
This centre works as an information centre through the internet document allowing the dissemination of all the cultural information related to a theme (e.g.: Picasso, the gothic architecture, the painters of the 1500, the Greece sculpture ..) and can reach other centre that manage other themes in order to give a complete overview on cultural heritage. The related services are aimed to disseminate cultural events (stages, exhibitions, workshops, meetings, manifestations..) on which the theme is treated.
The integrated cultural system is therefore a structured capillary make-up of information of primary layer (images,texts,photo, video,..) archived into the agents entity (museums, library,...) that keeps the information and the semantic structures of second layer (cultural service centres) that know how to join the primary layer information via an high speed network (ATM ) and can furnish it to the final user via internet.
tools for culture on line archive of primary cultural data
(A)
meta-database for multi-linguism and interoperability
(B)
Cultural Integrated System General Schema
With reference to the schema, it is obvious one must think of a technological support in order to satisfy these communication needs, however, it is not enough.
We believe in two types of intervention:
a) an heterogeneous tool kit that allow the user navigation into the cultural heritage patrimony via internet. The tool kit is composed by several specialised tools on different cultural fields (handling of paintings (zoom,color filter, restoration results visualisation..), handling of sculpture (3D visualisation, radiography maps, ...) , handling of archaeological ruins (Virtual reality reconstruction, forecast for environmental effects,..), a cultural on-line browser (multilingual and interoperable thematic inquiring of raw data, correlation of homogeneous information,..), etc..
With this environment the user can build an added value local database of cultural information highly manageable and customised.
The tool kit will expand the diffusion of cultural heritage on the user community with an educational and professional added value. By this tool kit the user becomes an active actor of the cultural evolution and can articulate and develop personal theory on the specific cultural subject.
The aim of this tool kit is to transform an user from a passive actor to an active one.
b) a whole of cultural service centres particularly specialised on single cultural subject or complex subjects (archaeology, architecture,..) capable of dialoguing with all the cultural information depository structures (museums, library,..) via an wide-band networks (Euro ISDN, ATM).
These centres are pivotal elements of the nervous system at the base of the flow of the cultural heritage information.
Some steps are:
The first part of the project has to be funded by different sponsors then when the project is running funding will be obtained by the project itself reselling information, high quality images and 3d models, interactive hypermedia titles and other digital products.
Creation of a group of different subjects coming from: Museums, Universities, Software Market Leader, Hardware Producer, Telecommunication and/or Entertainment Company. This work-group will promote the creation of a trans-European network aimed to promote, share and resell information related to Cultural Heritage.
In conclusion the main investment related to the project is based on the human resource usage.
Particular attention is paid to the capacity of the system to divulge itself even in areas not in the European Community and, therefore, research is also addressed to international structures, companies, G7 area, Mediterranean, Eastern European, Switzerland, capable of making-up the pivotal point of new and potential users in the Cultural Heritage sector.
It is our intention to continue growing in the project framework during the successive project phases towards increasing the network of dissemination via Euro-ISDN, thereby increasing the possibility for success.
Since the particular nature of the project and the choice to take on not a research project but to individualise the road and the strategy with which to follow an ambitious project and prevalently industrial, we are aware that the complex framework combined in the project constitutes a valid starting point for the future network of European and International culture through the Euro-ISDN network.
The assumptions underlying the successful implementation of the services are the following:
The Project Phase for which financial aid is requested is the Feasibility Study (1st year - kick off +12 months). During this phase an analysis of the pubblic mission and educational requirements will be done in order to better point out the cultural service centres architectural functions. An analysis of the market plan and the contractual matter about international interchanging mechanism and proper protection of intellectual property rights and copyrights will be performed starting from a target user profile study.
In particular the Work Breakdown Activities of the first year is the following:
|
Task Number |
WP Number |
WP title |
|
3 |
WP 1100 |
Survey on the state of the art |
|
4 |
WP 1200 |
Market plan |
|
5 |
WP 1300 |
Partner research and economical agreement definition |
|
6 |
WP 1400 |
Target User profile definition |
|
7 |
WP 1500 |
Requirements definition, tools, service centers, application |
|
8 |
WP 1600 |
Study for the reuse of existing applications into the defined architecture |
|
10 |
WP 1700 |
Architecture definition and tools definition |
|
11 |
WP 1800 |
Dissemination of results |
|
13 |
WP 1900 |
Management |
|
WP 2000 |
CSC model demonstrator |
|
Task Number |
Milestones |
|
1 |
Kick-off |
|
9 |
Requirements review |
|
12 |
Assessment on feasibility study
|
The project subject to this contract is the commercial validation and demonstration stage for a project of common interest in the area of Cultural Heritage . It includes studies and technical support measures addressing the elements necessary for a decision by the contractors to invest in a sustainable project of common interest. It allows the contractors to verify the conditions under which a positive decision to implement the sustainable project of common interest can be taken.
Considering the preliminary phase of the project (feasibility study), the monitoring of the commercial validation and demonstration shall be based on the following key physical and financial indicators including those which are essential to decide on further investments :
In this project phase some indicators like economical indicators like revenue, number of contract, percentage of the market area,... are out of consideration and will be considered into the deployment phase. The work will be subdivided in Work packages (WP) and each WP will ="TOP">
Cultural heritage application map
Cultural heritage application prices list
WP 1700
CSC functional and physical description
Infrastructures and equipment estimation cost
WP 1800
Feedback on demo dissemination
Number of access to the cultural network
WP 2000
CSC model kernel functions estimation
WP 1900
Respect of planned milestones
2. Description of the workpackages
The following forms illustrate the detailed description of the MOSAIC project Workpackages.
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1100 |
TASK Nr. 3 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: DISET |
Start Month T0 End month:T0+1 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : SURVEY on the STATE of the ART |
|||
|
Activities
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months
DISET 0.5 JRC 0.5 ARENOTHEC 0.5 ZGDV 0.2
Total Man Months: 1.7 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Technological and interoperability guidelines
Financial indicators:
|
||
|
Deliverables |
|||
|
Milestones
|
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1200 |
TASK Nr. 4 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: BDR |
Start month: T0+3 End month: T0+10
|
||
|
Objectives and approach : MARKET PLAN
|
|||
|
Activities
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months BDR 3 ARENOTHEC 1.1 DISET 2.5 INFOBYTE 1 CINECA 0.4
Total Man Months: 8 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Financial indicators:
Economical feasibility assessment |
||
|
Deliverables
|
|||
|
Milestones
T0+12 Assessment on feasibility study |
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1300 |
TASK Nr. 5 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: DISET |
Start month: T0 End month: T0+12 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : PARTNER RESEARCH and ECONOMICAL AGREEMENT DEFINITION
|
|||
|
Activities
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months DISET 3.5 ARENOTHEC 2 INFOBYTE 1.5 BDR 1.9 ZGDV 1 CINECA 0.5 JRC 0.5
Total Man Months: 10.9 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Number of partners
Financial indicators:
Number of promoters |
||
|
Deliverables |
|||
|
Milestones T0+12 Assessment of feasibility study |
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1400 |
TASK Nr. 6 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: ARENOTHEC |
Start month: T0 End month: T0+3 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : TARGET USER PROFILE DEFINITION
|
|||
|
Activities
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months
ARENOTHEC 3.5 INFOBYTE 3
Total Man Months: 6.5 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Financial indicators:
Market application area individuation |
||
|
Deliverables
|
|||
|
Milestones
|
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1500 |
TASK Nr. 7 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: INFOBYTE |
Start month: T0+3 End month: T0+6 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : REQUIREMENTS, TOOLS, SERVICE CENTERS, APPLICATION |
|||
|
Activities define, analyse and outline the following items:
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months BDR 1 JRC 2 ARENOTHEC 3.1 ZGDV 2 DISET 3 INFOBYTE 2 CINECA 0.5
Total Man Months: 13.6 |
MONITORING Physical indicators: Respect of European standard requirements
Financial indicators:
|
||
|
Deliverables
|
|||
|
Milestones T0 + 6 Requirements review |
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1600 |
TASK Nr. 8 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: JRC |
Start month: T0+6 End month: T0+9 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : STUDY for the REUSE of EXISTING APPLICATIONS into the DEFINED ARCHITECTURE
|
|||
|
Activities
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months BDR 1.5 JRC 1.5 ARENOTHEC 1.9 DISET 3.2 INFOBYTE 1
Total Man Months: 9.1 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Cultural heritage application map
Financial indicators:
Cultural heritage application prices list |
||
|
Deliverables
|
|||
|
Milestones
|
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1700 |
TASK Nr. 10 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: INFOBYTE |
Start month: T0 +6 End month: T0+9 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : ARCHITECTURE DEFINITION and TOOLS DEFINITION
|
|||
|
Activities
- estimate the service center equipments - estimate the response time required for different services and media material - evaluate and define the CSC functions (server functional architecture) - describe the user functional layer
- compatibility with existing infrastructure performance requirements - user platform and CSC configuration (server phisycal architecture) - network services layers and associated costs
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months ZGDV 1 DISET 3.4 INFOBYTE 2 JRC 0.5
Total Man Months: 6.9 |
MONITORING Physical indicators: CSC functional and physical description
Financial indicators: Infrastructures and equipment estimation cost |
||
|
Deliverables
|
|||
|
Milestones
|
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1800 |
TASK Nr. 11 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: DISET |
Start month: T0 + 9 End month: T0 + 12 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : DISSEMINATION of RESULTS
|
|||
|
Activities Create and manage :
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months BDR 1.5 JRC 1.5 ARENOTHEC 1 ZGDV 1 DISET 3.5 INFOBYTE 1.2 CINECA 0.4
Total Man Months: 10.1 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Feedback on demo dissemination
Financial indicators:
Number of access to the cultural network |
||
|
Deliverables
|
|||
|
Milestones T0+12 Assessment of feasibility study |
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 1900 |
TASK Nr. 13 |
||
|
Workpackage leader: BDR |
Start month: T0 End month: T0+12 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : MANAGMENT of the Mosaic project for the feasibility study.
|
|||
|
Activities
progress monitoring and control
project reporting and reviews
meetings management
documentation management
coordinate the Contractors activities and schedules
to manage the contractual interface to the Commission
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months BDR 8
Total Man Months: 8 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Respect of planned milestones
Financial indicators:
|
||
|
Deliverables |
|||
|
Milestones T0+12 Assessment of feasibility study |
|||
PROJECT TITLE : MOSAIC
|
WORK PACKAGE Nr. 2000 |
TASK Nr. |
||
|
Workpackage leader: CINECA |
Start month: T0 + 8 End month: T0 + 12 |
||
|
Objectives and approach : CSC MODEL DEMONSTRATOR
|
|||
|
Activities
Create and manage :
|
Responsible Partner of activity
|
||
|
Participants Man/Months BDR 1.4 JRC 2.6 ARENOTHEC 1.4 ZGDV 1.5 DISET 2.3 INFOBYTE 2.2 CINECA 1.6
Total Man Months: 13 |
MONITORING Physical indicators:
Feedback on demo
Financial indicators:
Cost element linked to the model |
||
|
Deliverables |
|||
|
Milestones T0+12 Assessment of feasibility study |
|||
Annex I.4 to I.6
ESTIMATED BREAKDOWN of COST
Estimated breakdown of costs / partner (in ECUs)
|
A.I.4 |
Estimated breakdown of costs / partner (in Ecus) |
||||||||||||||
|
MOSAIC PROJECT |
|||||||||||||||
|
Cat. of cost |
BDR |
DISET |
CINECA |
Infobyte |
ARENOTHEC |
JRC |
ZGDV |
TOTAL |
|||||||
|
personnel |
205000 |
226400 |
25200 |
144400 |
133200 |
85400 |
77600 |
897200 |
|||||||
|
equipment |
0 |
||||||||||||||
|
3rd party assistance |
35200 |
59000 |
13000 |
30000 |
41400 |
30000 |
12000 |
220600 |
|||||||
|
travel & subsistence |
30000 |
32000 |
14000 |
35000 |
28000 |
20000 |
10000 |
169000 |
|||||||
|
consum. & computing |
35000 |
28000 |
18000 |
25000 |
18000 |
7800 |
23300 |
155100 |
|||||||
|
other costs |
0 |
||||||||||||||
|
overheads |
45000 |
41000 |
5000 |
36000 |
10000 |
7000 |
27000 |
171000 |
|||||||
|
TOTAL |
350200 |
386400 |
75200 |
270400 |
230600 |
150200 |
149900 |
175100 |
193200 |
0 |
135200 |
115300 |
75100 |
74950 |
768850 |
|
cost basis (FC or AC) |
FC |
FC |
AC |
FC |
FC |
FC |
FC |
|
|||||||
|
FC=Full Costs, AC= Additional Costs |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
A.I.5.1 |
Estimated breakdown of costs / partner (in Ecus) |
|||||||
|
WP 1100 - Survey on the state of the art |
||||||||
|
Cat. of cost |
BDR |
DISET |
CINECA |
INFOBYTE |
ARENOTHEC |
JRC |
ZGDV |
TOTAL |
|
personnel |
5169 |
4593 |
4692 |
2316 |
16771 |
|||
|
equipment |
0 |
|||||||
|
3rd party assistance |
0 |
|||||||
|
travel & subsistence |
0 |
|||||||
|
consum. & computing |
0 |
|||||||
|
other costs |
0 |
|||||||
|
overheads |
936 |
345 |
385 |
806 |
2471 |
|||
|
TOTAL |
0 |
6105 |
0 |
0 |
4938 |
5077 |
3122 |
19242 |
|
|
50 |
50 |
100 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
400 |
|
EU contribution |
0 |
3053 |
0 |
0 |
2469 |
2538 |
1561 |
9621 |
|
partner contribution |
0 |
3053 |
0 |
0 |
2469 |
2538 |
1561 |
9621 |
|
cost basis (FC or AC) |
FC |
FC |
AC |
FC |
FC |
FC |
FC |
|
|
FC=Full Costs, AC= Additional Costs |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
A.I.5.2 |
Estimated breakdown of costs / partner (in Ecus) |
|||||||
|
WP 1200 - Market plan |
||||||||
|
Cat. of cost |
BDR |
DISET |
CINECA |
INFOBYTE |
ARENOTHEC |
JRC |
ZGDV |
TOTAL |
|
personnel |
33607 |
25845 |
2965 |
10388 |
10105 |
82909 |
||
|
equipment |
0 |
|||||||
|
3rd party assistance |
7040 |
23600 |
9000 |
12420 |
52060 |
|||
|
travel & subsistence |
0 |
|||||||
|
consum. & computing |
0 |
|||||||
|
other costs |
0 |
|||||||
|
overheads |
7377 |
4680 |
588 |
2590 |
759 |
15994 |
||
|
TOTAL |
48024 |
54125 |
3553 |
21978 |
23283 |
0 |
0 |
150964 |
|
|
50 |
50 |
100 |
50 |
50 |
0,00 |
||
|
EU contribution |
24012 |
27063 |
3553 |
10989 |
11642 |
0 |
0 |
77258 |
|
partner contribution |
24012 |
27063 |
0 |
10989 |
11642 |
0 |
0 |
73705 |
|
cost basis (FC or AC) |
FC |
FC |
AC |
FC |
FC |
FC |
FC |
|
|
FC=Full Costs, AC= Additional Costs |
||||||||
|
A.I.5.3 |